If the chairman would yield, I would ask whether any of the money in the fiscal year 1997 funding for particulate research will go to implementing an ambient air quality and emissions monitoring program, and will EPA be placing the monitors, or simply telling the States to do it? We want to know not just whether this expense will bring any health benefits, but also whether it will create serious unfunded mandates problems. I would ask the chairman if he would join me in requesting that the EPA send the appropriate committees of Congress, within 90 days, a description of the monitoring program they will be implementing and to what extent EPA will fund the cost of that program, and whether they intend to ask for additional funding in fiscal year 1998.
Duncan Faircloth: “If the chairman would yield, I would ask whether any of the money in the fiscal year 1997 funding for particulate…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the funding and implementation of air quality monitoring programs during a congressional discussion.
Share
More from Duncan Faircloth
I have few superlatives that I can claim as a Member of the Senate, but one of them is that I have spent 52 years in active agriculture, farming, and in all phases of it. I would be hard pressed to find the crop or the livestock interest…
Now read the bottom, line 10. It clearly includes the attorneys for the tobacco companies.
If the Senator will read, at the top, it clearly says--in the English language it is pretty clear--that it includes all matters, defendant or otherwise.
I am shocked that the Senate rejected two prior attempts to limit these attorneys' fees, and I am amazed that we are here to debate whether a four thousand dollar per hour cap is enough for the trial lawyers. Over the past few days, a…





