So, I agree that we need to reduce the regulatory burden, but in doing that, we should not undermine the protections that Davis-Bacon offers to our taxpayers so that we can get the best value for our taxpayer dollars.
Editor's note · Context
Rouzer emphasizes the importance of maintaining Davis-Bacon protections while reducing regulatory burdens.
Share & report
More from David Rouzer
Farmers, homebuilders, businesses, manufacturers, and many other hard-working Americans rely on the Corps and EPA for predictable, workable, and stable WOTUS regulations.
Novo Nordisk cannot conduct onsite avoidance and minimization analysis before they know what parcel of property must be avoided.
Mr. Speaker, for the first time since 1932, North Carolina will receive a new statue representing our State in the U.S. Capitol tomorrow. The late Reverend Billy Graham, Jr., was a very cherished Christian leader and an exemplary North…
Mr. Chairman, this amendment would help provide Congress with useful information on the staffing needs for processing Clean Water Act permits. Ensuring the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers have the necessary resources to issue permits…





