I think the problem specifically is that it is Federal water. I would add, again to paint a mental picture here, you have State and local officials that want to have a no-wake zone; and the only reason why there is not a no-wake zone there is because the Army Corps of Engineers and the Coast Guard do not recognize it. Again, I would suspect that is specifically because it is Federal water. This amendment is narrowly tailored to address this specific public safety issue. Again, I would encourage my colleagues to support the amendment. Mr. DeFAZIO. Will the gentleman yield?
Share
More from David Rouzer
Today marks a monumental day for the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina, the effects of which will transcend generations. The Lumbee have fought tirelessly for decades to achieve full recognition by the U.S. Congress. Today, that day has…
there is no greater example of bureaucratic overreach than the nightmare of complying with and understanding the definition of a water of the United States.
For more than half a century, the Clean Water Act has worked to improve the quality of our nation's waterways.
On Roll Call No. 384, I mistakenly voted Noe when I intended to vote Aye. Amendment No. 20 Offered by Ms. Boebert The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote on amendment No. 20, printed in part B of House…





