Given the prevalence of that, wouldn't it be true that there would have been a fairly obvious need for a significant security profile around the Capitol on January 6?
Dan Bishop: “Given the prevalence of that, wouldn't it be true that there would have been a fairly obvious need for a significant…”
Editor's note · Context
Bishop questioned the need for security at the Capitol on January 6 due to known threats.
Share
More from Dan Bishop
It makes no sense that the Biden administration refuses to take common-sense steps to secure our border in the face of such obvious threats to our homeland.
Isn't that the best technique? If you're trying to see to it that noncitizens vote and turn the margin in close races and you consider that to be essential to your political success, then what are you going to do?
Isn't that significant, the fact that a Majority of the Committee charged by the Congress to inquire into the grounds for impeaching the President of the United States has issued has marked up a contempt resolution?
I think they'd be proud of the right to vote. I think they would be absolutely committed to the idea that folks who haven't gone through the same process that they've done and accomplished the same outcome should not be voting.





