The distinguished chairman of the committee offered to correct me by saying that the bill only prohibits forced arbitration, said that was a correction, as if I misspoke as to facts. Let me read from the language of the bill: ``Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, no predispute arbitration agreement or predispute joint-action waiver shall be valid or enforceable with respect to an employment dispute, consumer dispute, antitrust dispute, or civil rights dispute.'' The word ``forced'' was not in that language, Madam Speaker. It prohibits all predispute arbitration agreements and post-joint action waivers. I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Gaetz).
Dan Bishop: “The distinguished chairman of the committee offered to correct me by saying that the bill only prohibits forced…”
Share
More from Dan Bishop
Isn't that the best technique? If you're trying to see to it that noncitizens vote and turn the margin in close races and you consider that to be essential to your political success, then what are you going to do?
Everyone agrees that the fentanyl crisis is a terrible and serious public health and crime issue, but a mass, warrantless surveillance tool created by word games is not the answer. It is dangerous. Indeed, the willingness and desire of…
One of the things interesting about this process, the weaponization hearings to me, is the number of witnesses that I've understood at least have some political origin on the left who've been before this Committee.
With the expansion of CBP One, however, I know that the administration, once again, intends on only managing the public perception of illegal immigration instead of actually securing the border.





