On the recordJune 11, 1997
It would be difficult without reviewing the entire bill to see. It may be, more than a cut, it may be a shift in resources might be needed more than a cut itself.
Source
govinfo.govCharles Taylor: “It would be difficult without reviewing the entire bill to see. It may be, more than a cut, it may be a shift in…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing potential changes to a bill regarding resource allocation.
Share
More from Charles Taylor
Jun 16, 2004
As the gentleman knows, this committee has been extremely generous to the national parks. Over the last 10 years, we have provided an additional $515 million specifically for park-based increases. This bill includes another $55 million…
May 18, 2006
I understand there is opposition being included in the Special Resource Study currently being conducted by the National Park Service. Would the gentleman agree to work with the ranking member and myself to see if we can resolve that?
Jul 18, 2002
I do share the gentleman's sentiments about the accessibility of quality care for our Nation's veterans. North Carolina has also experienced an influx of veterans in recent years and the failure of this VA pilot program is a setback in our…
May 18, 2006
I withdraw my reservation of point of order and claim the time in opposition to the amendment. The Acting CHAIRMAN (Mr. Gutknecht). The gentleman from North Carolina will control 15 minutes.
Other voices in this conversation
