As the gentleman knows, this committee has been extremely generous to the national parks. Over the last 10 years, we have provided an additional $515 million specifically for park-based increases. This bill includes another $55 million. That amounts to a total of $1 billion for 388 park units in fiscal year 2005. The committee has been concerned over the last several years that OMB has required the parks to absorb pay costs, antiterrorism requirements and costs associated with catastrophic storm damage. These absorbed costs total $171 million. However, there is another side to the story. As the gentleman may be aware, the Park Service is not managing the funds we have provided. The gentleman from Washington and I have raised issues with the Service related to excessive travel, too many large conferences and meetings, and the Park Service's inability to control major new initiatives, including the 100 partnership construction projects with a price tag of $300 million. These are projects that the Park Service has committed to without this committee or the United States Congress' knowledge or approval. Even if only a fraction of these projects went forward, they would have a devastating impact on both the backlog maintenance projects and park operations.
Charles Taylor: “As the gentleman knows, this committee has been extremely generous to the national parks. Over the last 10 years, we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding and management issues related to national parks.
Share
More from Charles Taylor
we appreciate the gentleman and gentlewoman for their leadership on this issue of fowl mortality associated with electric power lines. We always want to save any bird possible, but this is somewhat of a bird-brained interpretation of what…
on rollcall Nos. 415 and 416, I was detained in a conference with the Senate. Had I been present, I would have voted ``no'' on rollcall No. 415 and ``aye'' on rollcall No. 416. ____________________
Mr. Chairman, today we bring before the House for fiscal year 2004 appropriations a bill for the Department of the Interior and related agencies. This is a good bill that balances many competing needs and stays within the 302(b)…
Mr. Chairman, rise in opposition to this amendment. This funding limitation would stop changes to the National Forest Management Act planning regulations. This is a bad amendment, and that is the best thing I can say about it. National…





