The committee is very concerned about construction contractor performance and delays in providing the required work to the Architect within the specified contract completion period. Apparently the Architect has not been including penalty clauses in construction contracts as do other Government agencies and the private sector. Based on these concerns, we have included language in section 111 prohibiting the Architect of the Capitol from entering into or administering any construction contract with a value greater than $50,000 unless the contract includes a provision requiring the payment of liquidated damages within specified amounts. I believe this will rectify the problem.
Charles Taylor: “The committee is very concerned about construction contractor performance and delays in providing the required work to…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about construction contractor performance and contract penalties.
Share
More from Charles Taylor
I understand there is opposition being included in the Special Resource Study currently being conducted by the National Park Service. Would the gentleman agree to work with the ranking member and myself to see if we can resolve that?
I thank the gentlemen. I do recognize and appreciate you drawing it to our attention, the significance of the history of this matter, and we will take a look at it and see what we can do to work with the gentlemen.
If we withdraw any objection to this amendment, is the gentlewoman envisioning a rollcall vote or just a simple voice vote?
Again, I say this is a very difficult choice to make, and the committee has tried to be as bipartisan as possible. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIRMAN. The question is on the amendment offered by the…





