to summarize I would say that to say that we are losing money by our timber harvest is not true. The homebuilders, the realtors, people who rely on the forest products to build homes know that it is not true and they know it is important for them to have a home. This vote that the gentleman from Minnesota suggests is against public safety, as well as against the environment.
Charles Taylor: “to summarize I would say that to say that we are losing money by our timber harvest is not true. The homebuilders, the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the economic impact of timber harvest during a debate.
Share
More from Charles Taylor
I am aware of this situation. I understand that the Environmental Protection Agency should soon be releasing the results of the March audit for the Catawba area. Mr. McHENRY. I thank the chairman. It is also my understanding of the EPA…
I, too, am aware of this increasingly difficult situation, not just in the national parks, but along other public lands funded in this bill. They comprise 43 percent of the border, the southern border. We need to work together. I would…
I commend the gentleman. The San Marcos National Monument in St. Augustine, Florida, is one of the outstanding examples of parks for the east coast, and his effort is commendable. As the gentleman can appreciate, we cannot make commitments…
I am not qualified to speak on why the intelligence service says this, but I would yield to a gentleman to make a comment about who is qualified to make statements on that.





