To summarize I would say that to say that we are losing money by our timber harvest is not true. The homebuilders, the realtors, people who rely on the forest products to build homes know that it is not true and they know it is important for them to have a home. This vote that the gentleman from Minnesota suggests is against public safety, as well as against the environment.
Discussing the economic impact of timber harvest during a debate.
Share
More from Charles Taylor
Again, I say this is a very difficult choice to make, and the committee has tried to be as bipartisan as possible. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIRMAN. The question is on the amendment offered by the…
The amendment requires EPA to comply with the executive order by the first President Bush dealing with environmental justice. We have no objection to the amendment.
I raise a point of order. We have an agreement. I do not think we can strike the last word when we have a time agreement. Would the chairman rule on that and inform me? The Acting CHAIRMAN. Under the order of the House of earlier today…
I want to ensure my colleague from California that our water research program should be targeted and focused to solving real water supply problems. I am aware that the Resources Committee is advancing Mr. Doolittle's bill and that…
Other voices in this conversation
