It's less about Mr. Bannon himself and more just about not politicizing a really critical institution in terms of the national security of the United States.
Michael G. Mullen: “It's less about Mr. Bannon himself and more just about not politicizing a really critical institution in terms of the…”
Editor's note · Context
Mullen clarifies that his opposition to Bannon's role is about preserving the integrity of the National Security Council.
Share
More from Michael G. Mullen
You know, or you should, that our national debt has reached a peacetime record, heading for territory where other nations have spiraled into default or into the loss of sovereignty as creditors use their leverage to dictate terms.
The appeal is for a shift in national policy to the growth of the private, productive economy as our all-out, primary priority.
You know, or you should, that public debt this large weighs heavily on economic growth, crowding out private investment and discouraging it through uncertainty.
Instead of talking about the possibility of rewarding Pakistan with a nuclear deal, we should be enforcing the consequences for Pakistan's bad behavior.