Devoting significant resources to the biggest health threat in the world, the global HIV/AIDS pandemic, is an excellent use of taxpayer dollars, as long as we focus on prevention efforts that work. For example, the people of Uganda have had great success controlling the spread of HIV/AIDS, and they did it with a comprehensive program that did stress abstinence and fidelity, but also emphasized the importance of using condoms. The Pitts amendment would move significant dollars away from that proven model by providing $5 billion to strictly abstinence-only programs. It will push aside proven comprehensive programs in favor of questionable models designed to appease a right-wing constituency. Let us not miss the opportunity to do good by misspending precious resources on abstinence-only programs. We should not condemn more people to death by AIDS by tying hands with ideology. I urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' on the Pitts amendment and strongly support H.R. 1298.
Lois Capps: “Devoting significant resources to the biggest health threat in the world, the global HIV/AIDS pandemic, is an excellent…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the global HIV/AIDS pandemic and opposing the Pitts amendment during a House debate.
Share
More from Lois Capps
Unfortunately, we continue to see plans from some of my colleagues to cap services or to block the program.
I thank my colleague for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I respectfully ask unanimous consent to bring up H.R. 1217. It is a bipartisan piece of legislation called the expanded background checks bill, and I do so today in honor of a particular…
As has been mentioned, today, March 1, marks the beginning of Women's History Month. While there is much to celebrate, we must use this time to continue the fight toward full equality. That is why I rise today to reaffirm my support for a…
I was unavoidably detained. Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay'' on rollcall No. 183. ____________________