Cindy Hyde-Smith

I agree with the fifth circuit's description of this deeply disturbing this of really-not-looking-at-it or the head-in-the-sand approach.

I just find it extremely concerning that under your watch the FDA allowed the dangerous life-ending, because they do kill the baby, chemical abortion drugs to be ordered by consumers through mail or purchased in retail pharmacies without…

It is deeply frustrating that the subcommittee is being told--six years after a statutory deadline--that it will be another year before FDA issues a final rule on medical gases.

The law also requires the FDA to respond to petitions within a 180 days, but the FDA waited roughly 14 years and nearly 3 years to respond to citizens' petitions challenging FDA approval and deregulation of chemical abortion drugs.

In making its decision to eliminate the in-person dispensing requirement, none of the studies the FDA cited, which were largely conducted by abortion activists, studied the drugs under the new no-test tele-abortion regime.

I agree with the fifth circuit's description of this deeply disturbing this of really-not-looking-at-it or the head-in-the-sand approach.

I just find it extremely concerning that under your watch the FDA allowed the dangerous life-ending, because they do kill the baby, chemical abortion drugs to be ordered by consumers through mail or purchased in retail pharmacies without…

So the FDA, it's more of a legal issue of the procedure that happened than a safety issue of determining what drug is safe.

My main concern is an ectopic pregnancy that if the baby is not positioned which is deadly, or if she's further along that she's saying that she is.

I have heard from all of my local power companies in Mississippi. They are ringing me up.

It is deeply frustrating that the subcommittee is being told--six years after a statutory deadline--that it will be another year before FDA issues a final rule on medical gases.

My main concern is an ectopic pregnancy that if the baby is not positioned which is deadly, or if she's further along that she's saying that she is.

The law also requires the FDA to respond to petitions within a 180 days, but the FDA waited roughly 14 years and nearly 3 years to respond to citizens' petitions challenging FDA approval and deregulation of chemical abortion drugs.

So the FDA, it's more of a legal issue of the procedure that happened than a safety issue of determining what drug is safe.

In making its decision to eliminate the in-person dispensing requirement, none of the studies the FDA cited, which were largely conducted by abortion activists, studied the drugs under the new no-test tele-abortion regime.

I just find it extremely concerning that under your watch the FDA allowed the dangerous life-ending, because they do kill the baby, chemical abortion drugs to be ordered by consumers through mail or purchased in retail pharmacies without…

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I certainly appreciate the opportunity to do this, and thank you for being here.

I don't know what the definition of crisis in your mind is, and I don't know if everybody's just been told under no circumstances are you to call it a crisis, but I assure you Carla doesn't care who's Democrat or Republican in this room…

It is deeply frustrating that the subcommittee is being told--six years after a statutory deadline--that it will be another year before FDA issues a final rule on medical gases.

The law also requires the FDA to respond to petitions within a 180 days, but the FDA waited roughly 14 years and nearly 3 years to respond to citizens' petitions challenging FDA approval and deregulation of chemical abortion drugs.

In making its decision to eliminate the in-person dispensing requirement, none of the studies the FDA cited, which were largely conducted by abortion activists, studied the drugs under the new no-test tele-abortion regime.

I just find it extremely concerning that under your watch the FDA allowed the dangerous life-ending, because they do kill the baby, chemical abortion drugs to be ordered by consumers through mail or purchased in retail pharmacies without…

So the FDA, it's more of a legal issue of the procedure that happened than a safety issue of determining what drug is safe.

My main concern is an ectopic pregnancy that if the baby is not positioned which is deadly, or if she's further along that she's saying that she is.

I agree with the fifth circuit's description of this deeply disturbing this of really-not-looking-at-it or the head-in-the-sand approach.