Well, actually, you got to the point that I was going to ask. I know that you are not only an attorney, but you have also served as a judge, as well as a Congressman that we've come to respect. And so what I was going to ask is, is it constitutional for the Federal Government to tell somebody that they have to buy insurance this way? And what I'm thinking I'm hearing you say is that this would be something, if the Supreme Court would look at it--and I know you don't know exactly how they think or what they're going to rule, but if you use the basis of the Constitution, this would be marginally and maybe not constitutional. Is that what I'm hearing you saying?
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is questioning the constitutionality of the Federal Government mandating insurance purchases.
Share
More from W. Todd Akin
On rollcall No. 600, I was unavoidably detained. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea.'' ____________________
On rollcall Nos. 371, 372, 373, 374 and 375 I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 371, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 372, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 373, ``no'' on rollcall No. 374, and…
The question involves the Avondale shipyard-- which used to be Northrop Grumman, it is now a part of Huntington--and there are essentially three possibilities of what might happen to the shipyard. One possibility is that we leave the…
The point of the matter is that LHA-7 has to go forward, and we have to make sure that we have the funding. As soon as the negotiations are finished between the Navy and the contractor, then we can move ahead on this project. So the $150…





