Given that the new defense strategy focuses on only executing 1 major contingency operation, why would it not be prudent to keep at least 38 C-27Js, or more to reduce the assessed risk, in the inventory to meet warfighting requirements that were validated in the C-27 Analysis of Alternatives?
W. Todd Akin: “Given that the new defense strategy focuses on only executing 1 major contingency operation, why would it not be prudent…”
Editor's note · Context
Akin questions the decision to reduce C-27J aircraft in light of defense strategy needs.
Share
More from W. Todd Akin
On rollcall Nos. 371, 372, 373, 374 and 375 I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 371, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 372, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 373, ``no'' on rollcall No. 374, and…
I am a huge state's right guy, but the military is a federal thing and that is why I think it should be there.
On rollcall Nos. 519, 520, 521, 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531, 532, 533, 534, 535, and 536, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 519, ``no'' on rollcall No. 520…
I want to thank the VSO's both for expressing their support of my legislation and for their efforts on behalf of our Nation's veterans and their families.





