Political Quotes

W. Todd Akin: The history of missile defense goes back quite a ways. It goes back to Ronald Reagan, who proposed the whole idea of…

On the recordApril 14, 2010
The history of missile defense goes back quite a ways. It goes back to Ronald Reagan, who proposed the whole idea of missile defense; and people, liberals, tried to make fun of it. They said it was Star Wars, and it will never work, and it will destabilize relations between nuclear armed countries like us and the Soviet Union. Ronald Reagan said, no, I don't think so. He said, we have a responsibility to defend our citizens, and we need to build a missile defense. Of course, we, all the way through from the time of Reagan to when I came here in 2001, we had really not done it. President Bush went to the Russians, went to the Europeans and said, sorry, guys, I am going to let you know, here is your 6-months' notice. We are going to start developing missile defense. And, of course, the Democrats had been opposed to it, but they were in the minority, and we passed it when we were on the Armed Services Committee to do missile defense. And it wasn't missile defense against China or Russia, but it was missile defense against these rogue nations like Iran and North Korea. So we built it. In spite of the fact people said you couldn't do it, we did it. Test after test, we did it, and we made it work, and we built missile defense. Then they made a treaty with Poland and the Czech Republic, saying we are going to deploy missile defense not just in Alaska but in Poland and the Czech Republic.
Said by
W. Todd Akin
Missouri
Source
govinfo.gov
Apr 14, 2010

Editor's note · Context

The speaker discusses the history and development of missile defense in the U.S.

Share

More from W. Todd Akin

Mar 27, 2012

On rollcall No. 137 and 138, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present, I would have voted ``no'' on rollcall No. 137 and ``aye'' on rollcall No. 138. ____________________

govinfo.gov
Mar 6, 2012

Given that the new defense strategy focuses on only executing 1 major contingency operation, why would it not be prudent to keep at least 38 C-27Js, or more to reduce the assessed risk, in the inventory to meet warfighting requirements…

congress.gov
Apr 25, 2012

On rollcall No. 181, I was unavoidably detained and would have voted ``yea.'' ____________________

govinfo.gov
Mar 6, 2012

The $487 billion in cuts imposed upon the defense budget already concern me and I certainly do not support the devastating effect that sequestration will have on national security come this January.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation