Political Quotes

On the recordMay 25, 2011
As the chairman of the Seapower Subcommittee, we have taken a good look at LHA-7, and this is an absolutely essential ship. Nobody is arguing that point. It is a large deck amphib assault. What has happened, though, is that the Marine Corps decided that they wanted to put a well deck in the original design, which has caused some additional negotiations and slowed things down a little bit. But the point of this amendment is to strip $150 million away from this project. That is a very big problem. It is a big problem because next year we have got an aircraft carrier to build, a nuclear-powered submarine, and a destroyer, and this money needs to come from the budget this year in order to keep the LHA-7 on track. As we have talked about earlier this evening, we are in a bad position in terms of number of ships in the Navy. LHA-7 is critical, it is important, and stripping $150 million does tend to threaten the project, or at least push it off, and then you have to try and fund it in a year when we don't have the funds because we are building a bunch of other ships. So what this does is it guarantees that LHA-7 is going to proceed, but we have to allow enough time for the negotiations.
Said by
W. Todd Akin
Missouri

Share

More from W. Todd Akin

Mar 20, 2012

On rollcall Nos. 115, 116 and 117, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``no'' on No. 115, ``no'' on No. 116, and ``aye'' on No. 117. personal explanation

govinfo.gov
Feb 2, 2012

On rollcall No. 22, I was detained briefly for the vote. If I'd been in Chamber I would have voted ``aye.'' Stated against:

govinfo.gov
Mar 20, 2012

On rollcall Nos. 113 and 114, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``yea'' on both. ____________________

govinfo.gov
Mar 26, 2012

On rollcall Nos. 127 and 128, I would have voted ``yes.'' personal explanation

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation