So the bottom line should be about U.S. security. I mean, that's what we should be focused on. Yet how does it get us more security if we reduce our nuclear capabilities and other nations than become encouraged to increase theirs?
The speaker is discussing U.S. nuclear capabilities and national security.
Share
More from W. Todd Akin
On rollcall No. 22, I was detained briefly for the vote. If I'd been in Chamber I would have voted ``aye.'' Stated against:
On rollcall Nos. 697 and 698, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``no'' on rollcall No. 697 and ``aye'' on rollcall No. 698. Authorizing the Clerk to Correct Engrossment
The lady before me said it so eloquently and so simply: Why do we want to spend a whole lot of money? We're already in a crisis now. Huge debates about how are we going to control Federal spending. And here we find this proposal to drop…
On rollcall No. 134, 135, and 136, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present, I would have voted ``no'' on all three. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute, as amended. The…
Other voices in this conversation
