I am one of the two Congressmen who serves on the board of this Truman Scholarship fund. As has been explained here today, it is a very good use of money to help students obtain these different scholarships, to prepare them for work in public service. The problem is that the principal cannot be invested in a very flexible kind of way. That is why this is a modernization act, to allow us to use those funds. I think it is completely noncontroversial. I serve with a Member of the other party on that board. Everybody, as far as I know, is in agreement that this modernization needs to take place. It is going to result in more money for scholarships, and people will be better prepared for public service. It seems like everybody wins, and so I am a strong supporter. I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 6206.
W. Todd Akin: “I am one of the two Congressmen who serves on the board of this Truman Scholarship fund. As has been explained here…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the modernization of the Truman Scholarship fund during a House floor debate.
Share
More from W. Todd Akin
Given that the new defense strategy focuses on only executing 1 major contingency operation, why would it not be prudent to keep at least 38 C-27Js, or more to reduce the assessed risk, in the inventory to meet warfighting requirements…
I am a huge state's right guy, but the military is a federal thing and that is why I think it should be there.
On rollcall Nos. 502 and 503 I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 502 and ``aye'' on rollcall No. 503. ____________________
On rollcall Nos. 78 and 79, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present, I would have voted ``no'' on No. 78, and ``aye'' on No. 79. ____________________





