But the thing that fascinates me is how can one argue that the rifle should be destroyed on the one hand and, if they are destroyed, then the value is zero; yet, on the other hand complain that they are being sold? If I have a $10,000 porcelain artifact that an antique dealer would buy from me for $10,000 and I pick it up and I throw it to the floor and break it, I do not have anything of value. I think that is really what this debate is about. The taxpayers bought these rifles at one point for our military, and now we are hearing complaints when the taxpayers have the opportunity to buy them again.
Tina Smith: “But the thing that fascinates me is how can one argue that the rifle should be destroyed on the one hand and, if they…”
On the recordJune 27, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the debate over the destruction and sale of M-1 rifles.
Share
More from Tina Smith
Aug 1, 2026
Rural hospitals are vital for families in small towns and rural communities. These hospitals not only provide care close to home, they’re also economic engines for their region.
Jul 24, 2026
Abdul is the best candidate to win Michigan in November because he is the one who has the capacity to build the grassroots movement that is going to power Democrats to victory.
Jul 28, 2026
I’ve seen senators that go along to get along, that hoard their power, that protect themselves, and pacify big money. And then I’ve seen senators who are fighters, people who are determined, who have the strength and the conviction, people…





