But the thing that fascinates me is how can one argue that the rifle should be destroyed on the one hand and, if they are destroyed, then the value is zero; yet, on the other hand complain that they are being sold? If I have a $10,000 porcelain artifact that an antique dealer would buy from me for $10,000 and I pick it up and I throw it to the floor and break it, I do not have anything of value. I think that is really what this debate is about. The taxpayers bought these rifles at one point for our military, and now we are hearing complaints when the taxpayers have the opportunity to buy them again.
Tina Smith: “But the thing that fascinates me is how can one argue that the rifle should be destroyed on the one hand and, if they…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the debate over the destruction and sale of M-1 rifles.
Share
More from Tina Smith
This is a way for us to get cleaner energy, renewable energy, lower cost energy and to create homegrown pathways for cutting costs and keeping economic opportunity here in the United States.
And that's what I mean when I say we've lost these votes but that doesn't mean we've lost the fight.
I stand before this body trying to make sense of the terrible shooting at Annunciation Catholic School, just a couple of miles from where Archie and I live in Minneapolis, and I can't. I can't make it make sense. You know, I know this…
I don’t know whether Sen. Lee thought fully through what it was, you’d have to ask him, but I needed him to hear from me directly what impact I think his cruel statement had on me, his colleague.





