I simply want to add my words of support for the Stenholm version of the balanced budget amendment. Clearly, we need to change the rules here at the national level. Presently, there is no expectation that a budget should ever be balanced. That is one of the reasons that we seldom see presented to the Congress any proposals that seriously address the deficit issue. We did, however, have one opportunity last week, a budget alternative presented by the gentleman from New York [Mr. Solomon] would have challenged us to cut upwards of $660 billion over the next 5 years in order to attain a balanced budget by the time this constitutional amendment, if passed, would take effect. Sadly, far too few legislators chose to cast their votes in support of a real balanced budget initiative. Nonetheless, today we are called upon to vote for a policy change and to place this basic budgeting principle right in the Constitution of our land. It is my hope that in the future, if this amendment is adopted, that we will no longer debate whether we should balance the budget but, rather, how we ought to go about balancing the Nation's budget.
Editor's note · Context
Expressing support for the Stenholm version of the balanced budget amendment during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Timothy Penny
I compliment the gentleman from Colorado for his work in developing this package of spending cuts. As he just described, this proposal represents 550 billion dollar's worth of spending reductions over the next 5 years. That gets us much…
obviously constitutions should not be changed frequently and should not be changed for frivolous purposes. Our Founding Fathers in their wisdom guaranteed that any changes in our Constitution would be the result of deliberate and careful…
I come to the well today to pay my respects to our recently departed colleague, William Natcher of Kentucky. Throughout his long and distinguished career, he was an example of public service at its best. In over 40 years of service, he…
I would begin by responding that if we cannot be willing soldiers in the President's effort to cut less important programs to make room for emerging priorities, then we are not going to fare very well at any other level, whether it is…





