What we need today is a little more common sense. The Federal Government will spend in excess of $8 trillion over the next 5 years. The motion before us presently contemplates cutting back only $25 billion of the spending level. That represents a three-tenths of 1 percent cut in the total Federal spending. Who are we kidding that this is draconian? A three-tenths of 1 percent cut in total spending over the next 5 years? We here a lot of discussion today about how this is draconian, it is going to kill every program in the budget. This is more Washington nonsense. Over the past few days, the White House and party leaders here on Capitol Hill have been telling Members whatever it takes to get them to vote 'no.' ... It is all nonsense.
Timothy Penny: “What we need today is a little more common sense. The Federal Government will spend in excess of $8 trillion over the…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing proposed federal spending cuts during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Timothy Penny
I compliment the gentleman from Colorado for his work in developing this package of spending cuts. As he just described, this proposal represents 550 billion dollar's worth of spending reductions over the next 5 years. That gets us much…
I think, in reading the two amendments, it should be evident to any legislator serious about enforcing a balanced budget requirement that the only clear choice is the proposal offered by the gentleman from Texas. The alternative sponsored…
I simply want to add my words of support for the Stenholm version of the balanced budget amendment. Clearly, we need to change the rules here at the national level. Presently, there is no expectation that a budget should ever be balanced…
Madam Chairman, we rise to offer this amendment to offset all of the costs of disaster aid. When part of America suffers, all of America ought to come to their aid. That is the premise of this amendment. I am reminded of the movie Dave in…





