I was remiss in not thanking the chairman and recognizing the chairman for his efforts to increase the funding of PILT. I really do appreciate the initiative. This is not a comment in any way on the gentleman's custodianship of that extraordinarily difficult budget which he has to administer. These are very difficult choices. We understand that. We understand the need for research. We have spent millions of dollars on those research projects for fossil fuel over the years. I compliment the chairman on the job he has done. It is just that we feel that we need to go further.
James Oberstar: “I was remiss in not thanking the chairman and recognizing the chairman for his efforts to increase the funding of PILT.…”
Editor's note · Context
Acknowledging the chairman's efforts in increasing funding for PILT during a discussion on budget priorities.
Share
More from James Oberstar
The FAA in January of this year initiated a process to address the issues created by the so-called ``through-the-fence'' agreements. They formed a policy review team to gather information, evaluate the concerns, decide what kind of action…
I would just conclude that it's inappropriate for us to impose this penalty on the FAA through the appropriation process. A much more appropriate way would be to deal with it through our committee. I commit to the gentleman that we will…
Yes, indeed I will say, first of all to compliment the gentleman from New Jersey on his leadership on the issue of vessel discharge. He has been a champion on this subject. We have heard his strong appeal, his reasoned approach to the…
I, too, have natural resources--national forests, national parks, wildlife refuges. When fire, as it does regularly, strikes the national forest, that land regenerates. The oil destroys. It likely cannot be restored by itself or by human…





