Mr. Speaker, in light of the great confusion and dissatisfaction about the process that has led us to this point on the pending measure covered by the proposed rule, it seems to me that we ought rather to be spending our time dealing with aviation security. If we defeat the motion on the previous question, it will be the purpose of the minority side to bring up the Transportation Security Enhancement Act of 2001, which has been drafted largely in cooperation with the Republican majority on our committee, but with some significant differences. One of those key differences has to do with how screening is performed at the Nation's airports. Let me put this in context because the screener issue has been very largely overstated and not stated in the context of overall aviation security.
James Oberstar: “Mr. Speaker, in light of the great confusion and dissatisfaction about the process that has led us to this point on the…”
On the recordOctober 12, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing aviation security and the Transportation Security Enhancement Act of 2001.
Share
More from James Oberstar
Jun 23, 2014
We want to protect our waters. We want to protect our wetlands. We want to provide for future generations.
Sep 20, 2010
The Highway Trust Fund, based chiefly on the gasoline tax, will never again be adequate to fund even ongoing maintenance of our roads and bridges.
Sep 28, 2010
The City of Marquette kept its part of the agreement, conveyed property to the Coast Guard for $1, and now is going to be stuck with the bill. The problem is that the way the transfer worked out, the statutory PAYGO rules preclude…
Jun 18, 2019
A combination of analysis and tests may be used to show that the airplane is capable of being evacuated within 90 seconds...





