Mr. Speaker, safety is not just one issue. Safety is a multiplicity of overlying redundancies. Safety depends on the interaction of the human and the technological. What I object to in this proceeding is the lack of process, a lack of opportunity for debate on the future of the air traffic control system. Make no mistake about it, this debate is about the future of air traffic control in America. This is about how our air traffic control system will be managed in the future and by whom. It should be done in the public interest, not in the private interest. All that stands between the traveling public and a failure at seven miles in the air or on the ground is our air traffic controller and the equipment he will or she operates. We must keep it in the public sector.
James Oberstar: “Mr. Speaker, safety is not just one issue. Safety is a multiplicity of overlying redundancies. Safety depends on the…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the future of the air traffic control system and the importance of public management.
Share
More from James Oberstar
I agree that the Coast Guard should not conduct its business in this manner. It should recognize the contributions of the City of Marquette in exercising this conveyance, and we will continue to work with the gentleman throughout the…
The Highway Trust Fund, based chiefly on the gasoline tax, will never again be adequate to fund even ongoing maintenance of our roads and bridges.
The City of Marquette kept its part of the agreement, conveyed property to the Coast Guard for $1, and now is going to be stuck with the bill. The problem is that the way the transfer worked out, the statutory PAYGO rules preclude…
But we all also recognize that the potential cost of meeting these needs is immense.





