I find it a contradiction in terms. Furthermore, the language that the gentleman seeks to strike is a preference. It is not a prohibition, as I discussed in exchange with the gentleman from California. It is not an exclusion of anyone else, any person other than those in the two categories of previous military or law enforcement experience. So it just seems to me to be a puzzlement as to why we would. Notwithstanding the gentleman's explanation, I find it contrary to the amendment, contrary to the purpose of this legislation; and I urge my colleagues to defeat it.
James Oberstar: “I find it a contradiction in terms. Furthermore, the language that the gentleman seeks to strike is a preference. It is…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to armed pilots during a debate on aviation security legislation.
Share
More from James Oberstar
I agree that the Coast Guard should not conduct its business in this manner. It should recognize the contributions of the City of Marquette in exercising this conveyance, and we will continue to work with the gentleman throughout the…
We must move away from complete reliance on public funding for infrastructure and forge a new, stronger connection between private capital and infrastructure needs.
The efforts of Federal agencies can overlap and at times conflict, and currently, there is no body within the Executive branch to provide substantive coordination or, if necessary, resolution of disagreements among agencies to ensure…
Using a National Infrastructure Bank to finance a large part of our infrastructure needs means we will be able to target Federal spending more efficiently.





