I find it a contradiction in terms. Furthermore, the language that the gentleman seeks to strike is a preference. It is not a prohibition, as I discussed in exchange with the gentleman from California. It is not an exclusion of anyone else, any person other than those in the two categories of previous military or law enforcement experience. So it just seems to me to be a puzzlement as to why we would. Notwithstanding the gentleman's explanation, I find it contrary to the amendment, contrary to the purpose of this legislation; and I urge my colleagues to defeat it.
James Oberstar: “I find it a contradiction in terms. Furthermore, the language that the gentleman seeks to strike is a preference. It is…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to armed pilots during a debate on aviation security legislation.
Share
More from James Oberstar
the diverse water resources challenges throughout the United States are often studied, planned, and managed in individual 'silos,' independently of other water areas and projects.
I offer my very sincere and genuine personal gratitude to the gentlewoman from Minnesota, Ms. McCollum, and to the gentleman from Minnesota, Mr. Peterson, for cosponsoring this Special Order. Never have I been the subject of a Special…
I would just conclude that it's inappropriate for us to impose this penalty on the FAA through the appropriation process. A much more appropriate way would be to deal with it through our committee. I commit to the gentleman that we will…
Again, the acquisition of replacement land is available and authorized under OPA 90. What this amendment does is clarify that in that replacement you can replace that part of the ecosystem that has been irresponsibly damaged with better…





