Mr. Chairman, those who are here advocating a limitation or banning of snowmobiles from Yellowstone and perhaps from other national parks are operating under what I am convinced is a misguided understanding of snowmobiling. They are probably thinking of snowmobiles as they existed 10, 15, 20 years ago, not the snowmobiles that have been developed in recent years and which meet and even exceed the stringent standards that the National Park Service has established for snowmobile use in our national parks, as in Voyagers National Park in my district and as we are talking about with Yellowstone. Some years ago, there were 2,000 snowmobiles a day allowed in the park. Today that is 740. Fifteen years ago, they were noisier, perhaps more emissions emitted from such machines. Today it is vastly different. Snowmobile technology has vastly improved. The primary snow machine used in Yellowstone and in Voyagers has emissions 97 percent lower for particulates and 85 percent lower for carbon monoxide than machines used just even 5 years ago. The U.S. manufacturing sector, Polaris, Arctic Cat, Bombardier, have invested millions, even tens of millions of dollars to improve the quality of their snowmobiles to operate in our national parks and elsewhere throughout the United States.
James Oberstar: “Mr. Chairman, those who are here advocating a limitation or banning of snowmobiles from Yellowstone and perhaps from…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the advancements in snowmobile technology and its implications for national parks.
Share
More from James Oberstar
The Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010 is a bill this committee has worked on for the past 4 years, actually 6 years, starting in the time of the Republican majority, when our committee was united, our committee was unified behind this…
Again, in addition to Mr. Cullather, there are staff on the Republican side of the committee and other members on the majority side who have all worked together diligently. These have been stressful times these last several weeks as we…
The gentleman from Washington is mistaken in his understanding or his reading of the amendment that I offer. It's an amendment to OPA. It is not an amendment to the dollar amounts and does not reference dollar amounts. Under OPA, of which…
An orphan site is one of the issues to be addressed, as we do under the Superfund Act. Yet the order of priority for response under the law, its first responsibility, is for the responsible party to act to the limit of its liability under…





