Political Quotes

James Oberstar: We could have had an aviation security bill much, much, much sooner. Yes, the Senate bill was not a great product, but…

On the recordNovember 16, 2001
We could have had an aviation security bill much, much, much sooner. Yes, the Senate bill was not a great product, but it was passed a month ago, and this body could have acted before that or soon thereafter. We have been working 2- and 3-day weeks, really been putting in tough duty here in Washington, D.C. I have been flying back and forth across the country more than I am spending time in Washington. We could have had a bill sooner, except for the impetus of one of the gentlemen who spoke in the well earlier about this, who was dead set against having competent, well-trained Federal employees doing the screening and security at airports. This bill provides that almost every airport in America will have those competent, well-trained Federal employees in place within 1 year, to replace the minimum wage, undertrained, and sometimes felonious employees used today to supposedly provide us with security. We should have done it sooner. It is great we are doing it today. It is a good bill.
Said by
James Oberstar
Democratic · Minnesota

Editor's note · Context

Addressing the need for timely aviation security legislation during a debate.

Share

More from James Oberstar

Jul 20, 2010

In House floor consideration of the railroad retirement program, it was made very clear time and again by both sides of the aisle that this plan for railroad retirement was not a formula for Social Security. Both sides were at pains to say…

govinfo.gov
Sep 28, 2010

I agree that the Coast Guard should not conduct its business in this manner. It should recognize the contributions of the City of Marquette in exercising this conveyance, and we will continue to work with the gentleman throughout the…

govinfo.gov
Jul 1, 2010

I thank the gentlewoman for her courageous lead on this issue. This $35 billion for Afghanistan is roughly equivalent to the amount in the Recovery Act for highways and transit. If instead of Afghanistan these funds were invested at home…

govinfo.gov
Jul 30, 2010

Well, it is to replace what has been destroyed. It's really just clarifying what is already available under OPA, but making it clear that the funds can be used for those resources that have been damaged so badly they can't be restored.

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation