I thank the gentlewoman for her courageous lead on this issue. This $35 billion for Afghanistan is roughly equivalent to the amount in the Recovery Act for highways and transit. If instead of Afghanistan these funds were invested at home, we could do the equivalent of what we did in the Recovery Act, 35,000 lane-miles of highway improved; 1,262 bridges; 12,000 transit buses and rail passenger cars; 5,000 transit stations improved; and 1.3 million jobs that we've documented on our portion of the Recovery Act. But this is a conflict with no exit, no end, no offset; and we should not provide more money for it.
James Oberstar: “I thank the gentlewoman for her courageous lead on this issue. This $35 billion for Afghanistan is roughly equivalent to…”
Editor's note · Context
Oberstar discusses the allocation of funds for Afghanistan versus domestic infrastructure investment.
Share
More from James Oberstar
We want to protect our waters. We want to protect our wetlands. We want to provide for future generations.
The Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010 is a bill this committee has worked on for the past 4 years, actually 6 years, starting in the time of the Republican majority, when our committee was united, our committee was unified behind this…
Again, the acquisition of replacement land is available and authorized under OPA 90. What this amendment does is clarify that in that replacement you can replace that part of the ecosystem that has been irresponsibly damaged with better…
the efforts of Federal agencies can overlap and at times conflict, and currently, there is no body within the Executive branch to provide substantive coordination or, if necessary, resolution of disagreements among agencies to ensure…





