If the gentleman from Ohio will continue to yield, my question simply was, did the Committee on Appropriations understand in crafting this language that they were, in some sense, removing from the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management its responsibility for oversight and for authorization of these actions by the chief administrative officer in order to protect the House's interest in appropriate real estate transactions; protect us against speculative actions?
James Oberstar: “If the gentleman from Ohio will continue to yield, my question simply was, did the Committee on Appropriations…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of appropriations language on oversight responsibilities during a House debate.
Share
More from James Oberstar
I wish to express my appreciation to the ranking member of the full committee, Mr. Mica, who made a very elaborate statement about the provisions of the bill. I will not elaborate on it, except to concur with him that we are getting the…
I would just conclude that it's inappropriate for us to impose this penalty on the FAA through the appropriation process. A much more appropriate way would be to deal with it through our committee. I commit to the gentleman that we will…
An orphan site is one of the issues to be addressed, as we do under the Superfund Act. Yet the order of priority for response under the law, its first responsibility, is for the responsible party to act to the limit of its liability under…
Again, the acquisition of replacement land is available and authorized under OPA 90. What this amendment does is clarify that in that replacement you can replace that part of the ecosystem that has been irresponsibly damaged with better…





