The gentleman's language limits to 1999. So it cannot go back as far as the gentleman is suggesting. I regret that this matter could not have been resolved at the committee level. It is an issue raised out of deep conviction by the gentleman from Oregon. I support his concern.
James Oberstar: “The gentleman's language limits to 1999. So it cannot go back as far as the gentleman is suggesting. I regret that this…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing limitations in proposed legislation during a floor debate.
Share
More from James Oberstar
The Highway Trust Fund, based chiefly on the gasoline tax, will never again be adequate to fund even ongoing maintenance of our roads and bridges.
The City of Marquette kept its part of the agreement, conveyed property to the Coast Guard for $1, and now is going to be stuck with the bill. The problem is that the way the transfer worked out, the statutory PAYGO rules preclude…
The efforts of Federal agencies can overlap and at times conflict, and currently, there is no body within the Executive branch to provide substantive coordination or, if necessary, resolution of disagreements among agencies to ensure…
Using a National Infrastructure Bank to finance a large part of our infrastructure needs means we will be able to target Federal spending more efficiently.





