Political Quotes

James Oberstar: The reason for ending ICC regulation and oversight of express carriers was that the concept of express carrier had…

On the recordSeptember 27, 1996
The reason for ending ICC regulation and oversight of express carriers was that the concept of express carrier had become obsolete. The ICC staff itself recommended the elimination of express carrier status. It was not an oversight, it was not something that someone forgot to do, it was not something that was neglected in drafting. It was not a drafting error. It was done for good reason. The last express carrier went out of business in the mid-1970's. Federal Express purchased that carrier's operating certificates. The Surface Transportation Board, successor to ICC, advised us in writing, 'Federal Express apparently never engaged in the operations authorized by these certificates.' Subsequently, Federal Express obtained and operated new certificates which, according to the Surface Transportation Board, were 'different from the licenses typically issued to motor common carriers to provide express service.' In short, Mr. Speaker, and factually, without hyperbole, Federal Express has never been an express carrier. There have been no other express carriers since the 1970's.
Said by
James Oberstar
Democratic · Minnesota

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the obsolescence of express carrier status and the history of Federal Express.

Share

More from James Oberstar

Jul 1, 2010

I thank the gentlewoman for her courageous lead on this issue. This $35 billion for Afghanistan is roughly equivalent to the amount in the Recovery Act for highways and transit. If instead of Afghanistan these funds were invested at home…

govinfo.gov
Jun 10, 2010

We are going to hold them accountable. The Coast Guard will hold them accountable. I do want to point out that the emergency fund is an account within the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. It is not a separate fund of its own. Further, as…

govinfo.gov
Jul 30, 2010

The gentleman from Washington is mistaken in his understanding or his reading of the amendment that I offer. It's an amendment to OPA. It is not an amendment to the dollar amounts and does not reference dollar amounts. Under OPA, of which…

govinfo.gov
Jul 30, 2010

I have worked with the gentleman and our committee staff to craft this language. It's important to note that these are not taxpayer dollars paying for restoration, but rather proceeds from a penalty provided in this provision that is very…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation