Mr. Chairman, I rise without reluctance with great concern about this amendment in opposition to it. I have no hesitation at all in opposing this amendment, with great respect for the sincerity with which its authors come forward. But the road to destruction is paved with good intentions and sincerity, and we would be on a road to very serious problems with this amendment. As the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mica) has said and as the gentleman from Alaska (Mr. Young) officially in his remarks has said, the bill before us today is the product of a very carefully thought through, debated, negotiated compromise, like most legislation that passes this House. In this case we have the benefit of the best ideas from both sides of the aisle coming together in support of a bill that both sides of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure can support this far and no farther. Now, the idea of creating a permanent program to arm pilots as compared to the bill which has a 2-year experimental program would totally undo this agreement. I could not support the bill should this pass. Then the bill, I think, would not pass because I think there is great reluctance among Members on both sides of the aisle about the issue of arming pilots.
James Oberstar: “Mr. Chairman, I rise without reluctance with great concern about this amendment in opposition to it. I have no…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to arming pilots during a discussion on transportation legislation.
Share
More from James Oberstar
I wish to express my appreciation to the ranking member of the full committee, Mr. Mica, who made a very elaborate statement about the provisions of the bill. I will not elaborate on it, except to concur with him that we are getting the…
An orphan site is one of the issues to be addressed, as we do under the Superfund Act. Yet the order of priority for response under the law, its first responsibility, is for the responsible party to act to the limit of its liability under…
I completely agree with the gentleman. As the gentleman from Florida and I discussed in our hearing yesterday, the purpose of the trust fund is not to relieve anyone of responsibility. I was part of crafting that legislation in 1990 and…
We are going to hold them accountable. The Coast Guard will hold them accountable. I do want to point out that the emergency fund is an account within the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. It is not a separate fund of its own. Further, as…





