The Recovery Act language from our Committee was very specific that the Recovery Act funds, which are 100 percent funding, should be in addition to the program of projects the States had committed to undertake prior to enactment of the Recovery Act.
James Oberstar: “The Recovery Act language from our Committee was very specific that the Recovery Act funds, which are 100 percent…”
Editor's note · Context
Oberstar emphasizes that Recovery Act funds should fund new projects, not replace existing ones.
Share
More from James Oberstar
I completely agree with the gentleman. As the gentleman from Florida and I discussed in our hearing yesterday, the purpose of the trust fund is not to relieve anyone of responsibility. I was part of crafting that legislation in 1990 and…
Again, the acquisition of replacement land is available and authorized under OPA 90. What this amendment does is clarify that in that replacement you can replace that part of the ecosystem that has been irresponsibly damaged with better…
I wish to express my appreciation to the ranking member of the full committee, Mr. Mica, who made a very elaborate statement about the provisions of the bill. I will not elaborate on it, except to concur with him that we are getting the…
Yes, indeed I will say, first of all to compliment the gentleman from New Jersey on his leadership on the issue of vessel discharge. He has been a champion on this subject. We have heard his strong appeal, his reasoned approach to the…





