I vigorously objected to that because that included projects that had gone through the district, the division engineer that had a chief's report six, seven years ago.
James Oberstar: “I vigorously objected to that because that included projects that had gone through the district, the division engineer…”
Editor's note · Context
Oberstar criticizes delays in project approvals due to new start restrictions.
Share
More from James Oberstar
I completely agree with the gentleman. As the gentleman from Florida and I discussed in our hearing yesterday, the purpose of the trust fund is not to relieve anyone of responsibility. I was part of crafting that legislation in 1990 and…
Using a National Infrastructure Bank to finance a large part of our infrastructure needs means we will be able to target Federal spending more efficiently.
An orphan site is one of the issues to be addressed, as we do under the Superfund Act. Yet the order of priority for response under the law, its first responsibility, is for the responsible party to act to the limit of its liability under…
Well, it is to replace what has been destroyed. It's really just clarifying what is already available under OPA, but making it clear that the funds can be used for those resources that have been damaged so badly they can't be restored.





