Mr. Speaker, I rise to pose a question to the chairman. In the conference report's joint explanatory statement, critical language directing the FAA administrator to ensure that all runways at civil airports have standard runway cost safety areas in accordance with the most cost-effective and efficient method appears out of sequence. This language, which ensures that future AIP runway grants include provisions of bringing runway safety areas in accordance with FAA regulations should be included in section 514 rather than 515. Is that the chairman's understanding as well?
James Oberstar: “Mr. Speaker, I rise to pose a question to the chairman. In the conference report's joint explanatory statement, critical…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the placement of language in a conference report regarding FAA runway safety areas.
Share
More from James Oberstar
Mr. Speaker, I will conclude on our side recognizing and acknowledging the splendid work and the diligent effort of the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Cummings) who is the chair of the Coast Guard Subcommittee. He devoted an enormous amount…
This legislation makes clear that no State will be considered to have violated the Federal Highway Administration's competitive bidding requirements solely because the State chose to enact an anti-pay-to-play law. The bill would neither…
The FAA in January of this year initiated a process to address the issues created by the so-called ``through-the-fence'' agreements. They formed a policy review team to gather information, evaluate the concerns, decide what kind of action…
Well, it is to replace what has been destroyed. It's really just clarifying what is already available under OPA, but making it clear that the funds can be used for those resources that have been damaged so badly they can't be restored.





