I thank the gentleman's integrity and his pursuit of a personal and institutional objective. However, this is not an earmark for a project. It is not a designation of a specific venue for an activity. It is an authorization for the Department to make a decision which was done pursuant to the 2004 law, and in this legislation we simply extend what is already in existence as designated by the Secretary. Now, we are very careful in this committee. I will not stand for, in any aviation authorization bill, any specific designations or earmarks. People always want to have an air traffic control tower or center or something else designated in that bill. We keep it out. And we do not have any of those designations in this bill for specific districts for specific Members.
James Oberstar: “I thank the gentleman's integrity and his pursuit of a personal and institutional objective. However, this is not an…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the nature of an aviation authorization bill and the absence of earmarks.
Share
More from James Oberstar
I, too, have natural resources--national forests, national parks, wildlife refuges. When fire, as it does regularly, strikes the national forest, that land regenerates. The oil destroys. It likely cannot be restored by itself or by human…
The Highway Trust Fund, based chiefly on the gasoline tax, will never again be adequate to fund even ongoing maintenance of our roads and bridges.
A combination of analysis and tests may be used to show that the airplane is capable of being evacuated within 90 seconds...
Again, the acquisition of replacement land is available and authorized under OPA 90. What this amendment does is clarify that in that replacement you can replace that part of the ecosystem that has been irresponsibly damaged with better…





