I am proud to stand today to offer this amendment with the gentleman from New York and the gentleman from Nebraska. On behalf of the Sportsmen's Caucus, which has made the Conservation Reserve Program the main focus of this Congress, we are very pleased with the language that is in this amendment. This is a straight, clean, reauthorization of the Conservation Reservation Program, which is what we have been working for, for the last couple of years. I think the earlyout provision that has been negotiated with the gentleman from Nebraska and others is a good provision which is actually, in my judgment, going to benefit wildlife, because frankly, the first 5 years of these contracts are when they do the best job in providing habitat for wildlife. It might be a good thing to allow these to turn over after 5 years so we can take some of this mature cover and turn it into new cover, which is the best for wildlife. So, Mr. Chairman, I think we have got a very good compromise put together here. It is going to be good for wildlife, farmers, conservationists, and environmentalists. I am glad to support this.
Collin Peterson: “I am proud to stand today to offer this amendment with the gentleman from New York and the gentleman from Nebraska. On…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to reauthorize the Conservation Reserve Program.
Share
More from Collin Peterson
It is not a constitutional quagmire. I don't know why people bring this up, because it was clear in this 1892 court case what the situation is. The thing is, we initially asked, if I could explain, if it was possible to re-enroll the bill…
I just want to again thank my good friend Mr. Goodlatte for his leadership on this issue and the rest of the members of our committee who have worked very hard. We've produced a farm bill that is going to do our part in getting this…
I want to say to my good friend, Mr. Goodlatte, that I appreciate his support for this measure. And what we're trying to do in our committee is to develop a consensus as we move through this issue. And there are a lot of ideas, a lot of…
The Davis-Kirk amendment to the 2007 farm bill would erase sugar policy measures that are designed to save taxpayers funds and prevent the U.S. sugar market from being overrun with subsidized foreign sugar. The economic impact in Minnesota…





