It is not a constitutional quagmire. I don't know why people bring this up, because it was clear in this 1892 court case what the situation is. The thing is, we initially asked, if I could explain, if it was possible to re-enroll the bill and send it back to the President in the way that it should have been done in the first place. We were told that could not be done. The problem that we have is not so much a problem in the House, but a problem in the Senate, that there is no way that you could get this bill redone without re-passing the bill.
Collin Peterson: “It is not a constitutional quagmire. I don't know why people bring this up, because it was clear in this 1892 court case…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the challenges of re-enrolling a bill during a House debate.
Share
More from Collin Peterson
My staff worked through this and assured me this is the exact same bill that passed the House and Senate and was sent to the President.
I think what people need to understand, the farmer that sold the day before Katrina got his money out of the marketplace, and what the LDP did is protect those farmers that sold later to get the same price that farmer got right before…
I don't believe there is a tax increase in this bill. I have looked at it. I am a CPA, and I think you can say it either way, but I don't believe it is a tax increase. The $60 billion did come out of baseline not because anybody cut it…
Reclaiming my time. This was done correctly. The 14 titles that were overridden yesterday were passed in an identical manner between the House and the Senate. They were vetoed by the President in that manner. The bill, once the Senate…





