This authorization bill has a lot of good things in it, and I want to commend the gentleman from Florida (Chairman Goss) and the ranking member, the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Harman) and my colleagues for the work that they have put together in this bill. But this bill just is not strong enough. It does not fully authorize funds for the intelligence community's key counterterrorism operations. It authorizes less than a third of the funds that the intelligence agency needs for key counterterrorism operations next year, and that is just not the right thing to do when the Nation is under threat from terrorism. The administration has said that they are going to send down another supplemental request next year, but there is ample evidence that al Qaeda is plotting to strike us again this year, next year and into the future. This bill leaves 3 to 4 months open funding before a supplemental bill can get through this Congress. If there is another terrorist attack, do we want the next 9/11 commission to find that the Congress failed in our duty to fully authorize funding for counterterrorism? I think not.
Collin Peterson: “This authorization bill has a lot of good things in it, and I want to commend the gentleman from Florida (Chairman Goss)…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the inadequacies of an authorization bill for counterterrorism funding.
Share
More from Collin Peterson
I just want to again thank my good friend Mr. Goodlatte for his leadership on this issue and the rest of the members of our committee who have worked very hard. We've produced a farm bill that is going to do our part in getting this…
I would just take one additional small amount of time to thank my colleague and friend, Mr. Goodlatte, for the work that he did with me on this bill. As he said, this has been a bipartisan effort; had it not been, we wouldn't be here…
today we have a bill before us that is known as the farm bill, but this bill is much more than about farms. It is about the food we eat, the clothes we wear, and, increasingly, the fuel that we will use. The farm bill assures that we will…
It is not a constitutional quagmire. I don't know why people bring this up, because it was clear in this 1892 court case what the situation is. The thing is, we initially asked, if I could explain, if it was possible to re-enroll the bill…





