In other words, if Teamsters were concerned, and there was at issue here corruption in the last election, and therefore a reelection to get rid of that corruption, or at least to have an outcome that all would be satisfied with, we could still have the Department of Labor and/or Justice involved in overseeing the rerunning of this election, and your amendment does not prohibit that?
Discussing oversight of elections in relation to corruption and the role of the Department of Labor and Justice.
Share
More from Angie Craig
That would certainly suggest that the lack of staffing was at least partially related to the closure.
State fraud is the No 1 issue as Minnesota voters go to the polls in November.
But the only way we pass any of the progressive policies that all of us here support is by winning elections and taking damn majorities.
I do believe there is a compromise between better testing and creating rifts between our trusted exporters. The minority would be happy to work with the majority and the Congressman on honey regulation through FDA, but we don't believe…
Other voices in this conversation
