If we impose a cap on the price of energy, we are simply encouraging people to buy more energy and waste it because the price is so low they can afford to waste it. That furthermore discourages the production of more energy because if the price is capped, a company cannot make money producing more energy. So price caps are doubly a bad idea. They discourage production and encourage waste and make the problem worse. I remember when my wife and I first married and we lived in apartments, and then we moved into an unfurnished house and had to buy a refrigerator. We shopped around and looked at many models and narrowed it down to two different models, one for $250 and one which cost $500. Remember this was roughly 1962. So then I did an analysis of the energy use of the two refrigerators, and I said we have to buy the $500 one. The difference was efficiency of operation.
Vernon Ehlers: “If we impose a cap on the price of energy, we are simply encouraging people to buy more energy and waste it because the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of price caps on energy and the importance of energy efficiency.
Share
More from Vernon Ehlers
I have rushed down to the floor to support this amendment, and a little history is helpful at this point. When No Child Left Behind was written, it removed Eisenhower funding from the program. We had been putting in over $400 million per…
I am not necessarily in opposition to this amendment, but I just have to express a concern, and that is that we have been going round and round on this issue for a couple of years on venture capital getting involved. I always like the…
I personally would prefer, if we are going to show preferences here and use the money for that purpose, I would really prefer that we use those funds to give preference to those organizations that submit proposals for doing research and…
I do support this amendment and I think we should approve it... If you don't meet the market, you are going to lose your best teachers.





