I would like to comment that the issue of creating another layer of bureaucracy has been raised by other Members, and that is totally false. It does not create another layer of bureaucracy, it creates two positions side by side in the same layer, and I believe it is an appropriate role for the science administrator to have an equal status with the administrator who runs the rest of the agency. That is the real objective of this bill, to have science at a higher level, and I do not consider that an additional layer of bureaucracy.
Vernon Ehlers: “I would like to comment that the issue of creating another layer of bureaucracy has been raised by other Members, and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a proposed bill related to science administration.
Share
More from Vernon Ehlers
I rise in support of H.R. 3690, the U.S. Capitol Police and Library of Congress Police Merger Implementation Act of 2007, which will provide for the merger between the Library of Congress Police and the United States Capitol Police. While…
I am not necessarily in opposition to this amendment, but I just have to express a concern, and that is that we have been going round and round on this issue for a couple of years on venture capital getting involved. I always like the…
I am pleased to join everyone here in giving accolades to Miami University. Surviving for 200 years as a university of that stature, with strong emphasis on academic studies and background, is not an easy task for a university, and very…
I am proud to support S. Con. Res. 71, which authorizes the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to award the Congressional Gold Medal to Dr. Michael Ellis DeBakey. A pioneer in the field of cardiovascular surgery, Dr. DeBakey…





