If we are serious about budget problems, we should worry about how we can reduce the costs of burying nuclear waste. We have spent billions and billions of dollars on the nuclear waste repository in Nevada. Frankly, anything we can do to reduce the volume of nuclear waste is going to be a moneysaver, not an expenditure out the Federal budget. I support anything that is likely to reduce the amount of waste. It seems to me the supporter of the amendment makes a comment that it is reprocessing, and therefore it is bad. Of course it is reprocessing. That does not necessarily make it bad.
Vernon Ehlers: “If we are serious about budget problems, we should worry about how we can reduce the costs of burying nuclear waste. We…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial implications of the nuclear waste program during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Vernon Ehlers
Mr. Sant assured me that, with his reappointment, he would do his part to ensure that the "Nation's attic," which is the common name for the Smithsonian, is not being looted by those who have put personal gain above the interests of the…
I personally would prefer, if we are going to show preferences here and use the money for that purpose, I would really prefer that we use those funds to give preference to those organizations that submit proposals for doing research and…
The substance of the bill is good. I support the general intent of it. I am very concerned about several aspects. One of those is the size of the increase of the allocation, which is going to hurt our Nation's research effort in its…
This is a major area of concern. We are losing ground compared to other countries. Numerous international tests have displayed that our students are not doing nearly as well. That explains in part why we are losing business, research…





