If we are serious about budget problems, we should worry about how we can reduce the costs of burying nuclear waste. We have spent billions and billions of dollars on the nuclear waste repository in Nevada. Frankly, anything we can do to reduce the volume of nuclear waste is going to be a moneysaver, not an expenditure out the Federal budget. I support anything that is likely to reduce the amount of waste. It seems to me the supporter of the amendment makes a comment that it is reprocessing, and therefore it is bad. Of course it is reprocessing. That does not necessarily make it bad.
Vernon Ehlers: “If we are serious about budget problems, we should worry about how we can reduce the costs of burying nuclear waste. We…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial implications of the nuclear waste program during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Vernon Ehlers
Mr. Speaker, I rise today to discuss this bill and, first of all, to commend Mr. Holt for his efforts and his concerns. He is sincerely and extremely concerned about accuracy in voting, and what can be done to make certain that the results…
I have rushed down to the floor to support this amendment, and a little history is helpful at this point. When No Child Left Behind was written, it removed Eisenhower funding from the program. We had been putting in over $400 million per…
I just want to recognize the good work that the board has done, the importance of the preservation of both visual and audio recordings... So I strongly support this bill and urge its passage.
I was asked by the new Speaker, Newt Gingrich, some years ago--in 1995 to be exact--to take charge of setting up the new computer system for the House of Representatives. It was a formidable task. And one issue I emphasized over and over…





