Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume. I thank my friend and colleague from Missouri. I appreciate his concerns, appreciate the list. But in that list, I didn't hear anyone that would have to live directly under the new regulations that are being proposed or people that would offer comment with great concerns of how it would impact them. I am thinking of the agriculture community in my district, major community in the district, with great concerns about waters of the U.S. and the impact that it would have in doing away with the opportunity of the family farm, in many cases. So I don't see any significant problems with any ambiguity, if there be any, which this legislation might produce amongst agencies because we are always open to agencies coming to Congress asking questions. What did we mean? I think debates like this, that I appreciate, give an opportunity to look back and say this is what we debated, this is what we meant to do, and this is how you ought to carry it out. So the issue of any ambiguity that would come up from this legislation, in fact, I don't think it is a problem. It adds more insight. I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. Jenkins).
Share & report
More from Tim Walberg
Madam Speaker, I thank my friend and colleague from Ohio for yielding. Madam Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 4510, the NTIA Authorization Act. The legislation includes my bipartisan, bicameral PLAN for Broadband Act, which requires the…
What he was, he was a litigator expert from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that used their attempts to wave debt.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 6655, A Stronger Workforce for America Act, and express great appreciation to Chairwoman Foxx and Ranking Member Scott for moving this forward. In 2014, I was proud to work with my colleagues on the…
Mr. Chair, on Roll Call No. 324, I mistakenly voted Aye when I intended to vote No. Amendment No. 72 Offered by Ms. Jayapal The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote on amendment No. 72, printed in part A…





