this chart shows, I think, something that we can be very proud of. The increase in gross domestic product in this country has been plus 147 percent, where U.S. coal consumption has increased 100 percent, but U.S. energy consumption in total has only gone up 42 percent, and the key air emissions have actually gone down 31 percent. Mr. Speaker, the United States is leading the world in terms of pushing the kind of research that is going to reduce CO2 emissions, but whether it is CO2 or whether it is vapor emissions going into those greenhouse gases, or whether it is the kind of new technology where we can develop new energy sources, the United States is moving ahead probably more aggressively than any other country, and we need to do that, but we do not need to sign and agree to the Kyoto protocol, which is not based on complete science and which would be a punishment to the United States.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing U.S. energy consumption and emissions in relation to the Kyoto Protocol.
Share
More from Nick Smith
I rise to make the point that under the current law, there are no limits for government price support payments to farmers using commodity certificates. If commodity certificates and loan forfeitures would have been included under the…
after listening to the previous speakers, Mr. Speaker, I think of Ronald Reagan's words, There you go again. Every 4 years we sort of experience the spinning and the demagoguery that takes place in this chamber using these podiums and…
I would just like to speak about what some consider boring statistics on government growth. I can add later in this 5-minute short brief, on where we are on not only overspending but over-promising. We are now doing the appropriations…
the reason we are here is to make clear to the world that we are not going to have military conscription right now for active military duty. I introduced a bill last year, H.R. 3598, because I think we need to seriously discuss the…





