I am in opposition to implementing the Kyoto Protocol. Under the Kyoto Protocol, by 2008 to 2012 the U.S. would be required to slash emissions of greenhouse gases to seven percent below the 1990 level--a level last achieved in 1979. Based on projections of the future growth in U.S. energy use, this would require a real cut in emissions of over 30 percent. In the meantime, major greenhouse-gas emitters, such as China, India, Mexico, and Brazil, would be able to continue business as usual. In July 1997, before the Kyoto Protocol was signed, the Senate passed on a vote of 95 to 0 the Byrd-Hagel resolution, which states that the U.S. should not sign any treaty that (1) would mandate cuts in emissions only for developed countries and (2) would result in serious economic harm. This commonsense resolution set the absolute minimum criteria for Senate ratification of any climate treaty. The Clinton Administration never submitted the Kyoto Protocol to the Senate for ratification because it knew that it would be dead on arrival. In a breath of fresh air, President Bush said succinctly, ``I will not accept a plan that will harm our economy and hurt American workers.'' In stating the obvious and pulling the plug on this flawed treaty, the President has spared us from a U.N. boondoggle that would harm American workers, consumers, and businesses.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Nick Smith
I think it would be good for history's sake to look at the last time that we dramatically increased taxes. We did that; when President Clinton came into office, we had the largest tax increase in history, and what was the effect of that on…
H. Con. Res. 409 resolves that Congress recognizes with humble gratitude the more than 16 million veterans who served in the United States Armed Forces during World War II and the Americans who supported the war effort on the home front…
this bill, H.R. 3598, will ensure that the Federal agencies will coordinate their programs. That is important. It expands the effort to have more students be trained in the manufacturing science. That is important. It ups the authorization…
I appreciate many of the concerns of the previous speaker; but I think everybody should be very aware that for the 8 years under the previous administration, there was not one year that we reduced the debt held by the public as defined by…





