I joined the gentleman from Texas at the Hague, and what the Kyoto Protocol did is it left a lot of the details of implementation to further negotiations. One of the questions at the Hague was the so-called ``sinks,'' the sequestration of the CO2, and this chart, I think, demonstrates why the United States was trying to insist that sinks be a consideration in emissions. As we see by this chart, this is North America, and the red indicates the amount of CO2 emissions. The blue at the bottom displays the sequestration, or the sinks, how much of the CO2 we capture by our corn and our sorghum and our field crops and our woodlands. And when we compare that with Europe and the whole Eurasian and North African area, we can see that the amount of emissions of CO2 greatly exceeds the amount they sequester. It seems to me this was one of the reasons that Europe said, well, no, we cannot allow you any credit for sequestering those.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Kyoto Protocol and CO2 emissions during a speech on environmental policy.
Share
More from Nick Smith
Well, Mr. Chairman, let me just say that this is cut from one of the largest expenditures in the United Nations appropriations, that is, to the contributions to international organizations. I think the American taxpayer in general is not…
those that have tuned into the previous presentation I think understand that there are many challenges facing the United States of America. There are many needs, whether it is health or education or welfare or more money for transportation…
I think it would be good for history's sake to look at the last time that we dramatically increased taxes. We did that; when President Clinton came into office, we had the largest tax increase in history, and what was the effect of that on…
H.R. 2608 authorizes two important interagency programs to coordinate the federal government's efforts to mitigate the loss of life and property from earthquakes and windstorms. I'd like to thank Congressman Neugebauer for all of his hard…





