In fact, in July of 1997, before the Kyoto Protocol was agreed to, the U.S. Senate passed what they called the Byrd-Hagel resolution, which says that the U.S. should not be signing any treaty that, one, would mandate reductions in greenhouse gas emissions for developed countries but not developing countries; and, two, would result in a serious economic harm to the Nation. And of course the Kyoto Protocol moves in both of these directions. It does not include countries for any reduction, such as China, India, Mexico, Brazil, and many other developing countries. It seems to me this common sense resolution, which was approved by a Senate vote of 95 to 0, set the minimal parameters for Senate ratification of any treaty. And with no realistic idea that a treaty was going to be signed and eventually ratified by the Senate, which it has to be ratified for it to work, the Bush administration said let us move ahead and make sure we reduce our CO2 emissions, reduce our greenhouse gases, but let us be very careful about signing on to a treaty that is demanding almost the impossible.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Senate's stance on the Kyoto Protocol and its implications for U.S. treaty ratification.
Share
More from Nick Smith
it is my sincerest pleasure that I rise to recognize and compliment the congressional pages that will be ending their term of service this week. The House pages have made up the critically important staff that has kept the House floor…
reclaiming my time, although I support the intention of the chairman of the Committee on Small Business, my concern would be where the money comes from. So, in the MEP program, it is already sacrificing, and this also takes funds out of…
I am an outside member because my Subcommittee on Research on the Committee on Science overseas the U.S. Fire Administration, and this legislation reauthorizes the Fire Grant program. By the end of this year, we will have 25,000 fire…
you know, we are certainly in the campaign season of an election year; and I think everybody, Mr. Speaker, needs to be on guard for the talent to spin. And I am reminded of a cartoon that was in our paper recently. And there were four…





