Supplemental appropriation bills are too often used to fund expenses that can, on average, be predicted. They allow politicians to keep the annual appropriation budgets at a level that is less objectionable to fiscal conservatives. In effect it is a hoodwinking of taxpayers who think that Congress sticks to its budget. In my eleven years in this House we never have supplemental appropriation bills increase deficit spending and total debt of the government. A reasonable average of past supplementals should be included in annual budgets as a reserve fund that can be used for emergency or unexpected necessary spending. To do otherwise is not good spending policy.
Nick Smith: “Supplemental appropriation bills are too often used to fund expenses that can, on average, be predicted. They allow…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the misuse of supplemental appropriation bills in Congress.
Share
More from Nick Smith
Reclaiming my time, although I support the intention of the chairman of the Committee on Small Business, my concern would be where the money comes from. So, in the MEP program, it is already sacrificing, and this also takes funds out of…
How do we change? How do we develop the kind of discipline, intestinal fortitude to start slowing down this huge growth of government to the extent that we have decided we will simply borrow more and more money to take home to our…
And, Mr. Speaker, of course the lobbyists that come in, they would prefer that it be mandatory spending; so some of these programs, if they can write it in law that if they meet certain qualifications, they automatically get it and it does…
I think it is appropriate to mention the only reason this really came to the forefront and has become an issue is because the Election Assistance Commission Chairman, DeForest Soaries, proposed a possibility of a policy for allowing the…





