Under the Synar amendment, the States have passed laws to comply with SAMHSA. And, under that compliance they are required to enforce the law. And they are to so certify. They are to so certify to HHS that they are doing it. And part of that requirement is the so-called sting operations, that you wouldn't notify an operation that you are going to inspect them. So, this to me is double jeopardy on the States. You are taking SAMHSA that can take away their block grants and you have FDA, that you are trying to give money to, to enforce something that you already have the enforcement mechanism to do. We may disagree on this, but $1 billion is a lot of money. It is not an unfunded mandate.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Synar amendment and its impact on state enforcement of laws.
Share
More from Gerald Ford
I join with all of my colleagues in expressing my condolences and appreciation for the enormous contributions over the years that Mr. Charles made to American music. As many of the Members know, and as has been touched on already this…
I am just curious as a Member of the body and as a voter, when does it become President Bush's economy? You said this started back with Bill Clinton.
I come from a State with a good football team, but I am delighted that the greatest mind, at least in my era of following college sports, would see fit to allow a young Member like me to partner with him to do something that in the long…
what is the problem then if my colleagues believe in removing all these taxes, which I think there is a lot of merit to, I am a big tax cutter like the gentleman is? I support those ideas. How is that consistent with the taking 3 million…





